Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, This highly theoretical book of literary criticism begins with a description of "the social structure of passion" in the early modern world and then moves to analyze the works of Sidney, Spenser, and Shakespeare. The goal appears to be to map out a heretofore insufficiently described realm of literary sexuality opened by other theorists of early modern sexuality.
Queering, Queer Theory, and Early Modern Culture
It posits a unique form of human sexual relationship falling outside the realm of legible social practices-a kind of relationship that precedes and is then supplanted by the modern notion of intimacy. Gil's description of this unique form of sexual relation is theoretically flawed, but it nonetheless raises some interesting questions about the way we have, up to now, tended to see early modern sexuality.
Gil argues in his introduction and first chapter that these sexual relations arise from the "friction and turmoil generated by the conflicted, contested, and uneven emergence of a modern social formation" xi. In the midst of the chaos of a collision between the medieval order that placed value on persons based upon their family's hierarchical status-their blood-and an emerging modernity that emphasized individual merit, the literary figures Gil describes disappear from functional sociability.
First, attracted to one another by the newer social model of shared humanity, the subjects are then forced apart again by the intrusion of the old social order, which insists on blood-borne class differentiation; the shock of these colliding forces pushes [End Page ] them outside social legibility but also creates powerful erotic connections based on an experience of radical alterity.
The first chapter, "The Social Structure of Passion," begins by rehearsing Niklas Luhmann's sociological description of intimacy. In fact, Gil argues, using Alan Bray's formulation, that "early modern friendship may indeed be the precursor to the intimacy Luhmann models" 3.
- I Love You.
- HISTORICAL RECOVERIES, RECLAIMINGS, REREADINGS;
Gil's purpose, however, is to describe an early modern rival to intimacy that "also defines sexuality as a structure of relationship that is set apart from day-to-day social life but which is not yet rooted in a domestic or private sphere" 3. So he turns to Norbert Elias's The Civilizing Process , the description of the emerging reliance on personal manners and conduct to designate true nobility in the Renaissance, a cultural change demonstrated in early modern conduct manuals.
From here, Gil derives his notion of the confrontation of the old models of blood-borne nobility with the new models of universal humanity. The resulting crisis produced this socially uprooted rival to modern intimacy. In order, perhaps, to clarify why these crises should take the specific form of an erotic charge, the chapter then discusses Leo Bersani's "powerful account of sexuality as a pleasurable shattering of the ego or self" 8. In order to historicize Bersani, Gil transposes "the notion of sexuality as a failure of a self into an account of sexuality as a failure of certain kinds of social relationships"-the kinds of failures that would be the logical result of the fraught emergence of modernism in the sixteenth century.
He then demonstrates the presence of older models of the personality-models that do not describe a personality at all in the modern sense but rather a set of physical conditions-in several early modern treatises and literary pieces, also demonstrating moments in these texts when the old model seems to break down momentarily in favor of the new. Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied.
The E-mail Address es field is required. Please enter recipient e-mail address es. The E-mail Address es you entered is are not in a valid format. Please re-enter recipient e-mail address es. You may send this item to up to five recipients.
Before intimacy : asocial sexuality in early modern England in SearchWorks catalog
The name field is required. Please enter your name. The E-mail message field is required. Please enter the message. Please verify that you are not a robot.
Would you also like to submit a review for this item? You already recently rated this item.
Your rating has been recorded. Write a review Rate this item: 1 2 3 4 5. Preview this item Preview this item. Allow this favorite library to be seen by others Keep this favorite library private. Find a copy in the library Finding libraries that hold this item Provides a reexamination of early modern sexuality. The author examines sixteenth-century English literary concepts of sexuality, and shows how these works of early modern literature provide a discourse of sexuality that strives to understand status differences in erotic contexts, and thereby question key assumptions of modernity.
Read more Reviews User-contributed reviews Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers. Be the first. Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers.
http://maisonducalvet.com/casual-dating-de-ibi.php View most popular tags as: tag list tag cloud. Sex in literature. Literature and society -- England -- History -- 16th century. Literature and society -- England -- History -- 17th century. Sex customs -- England -- History -- 16th century. Sex customs -- England -- History -- 17th century. Man-woman relationships in literature.
Intimacy Psychology in literature. Sex Psychology in literature.